I'd like to use it to test an idea I had since the last KinnerNet.
KinnerNet is an uncoference created by Yossi Vardi. As such, the conference schedule is created, in the spirit of most other uncoferences, using a big white board on which people post their sessions.
This works great. I love watching the dynamics of this - the initial empty white board, the first person stepping forward and nailing down a slot with an idea, the rapid evolution of schedule, the informal conflict resolution...
But being a software-kind-of-guy, I can't help but wonder - can this process supported by a software tool?
Should this process be supported by a tool?
Will this process benefit - or suffer - from being supported by a tool?
My current thoughts are that if such a tool is to be of benefit instead of a hindrance, it should be modeled along the spirit of uncoferences. It should be flexible enough to accommodate rapid changes and evolution of the schedule, put a lot of emphasis on the individual and individual responsibility, and put accountability ahead of security and permissions.
The physical aspect may also be important. There is a certain undeniable charm in being able to approach the board, wipe out a session and move it to another slot. Can a tool reproduce this kind of intimacy with the schedule? Or will it take the fun away?
What are your thoughts on this?
Not a bad idea... We used Google Spreadsheets last time for BarCampBlock with pretty good effect... we've also used something called iCalico that was flakey but suited our needs well.
ReplyDeleteI certainly think that a flexible but straightforward scheduler would be a pretty nice thing to offer the open space/*camp community... hey, if you want to build it, go for it!
You can keep the scheduling process human, but use a web-based whiteboard. That way, you can start the signup process before the conference.
ReplyDeleteSomething like http://www.thinkature.com